Back in March, I announced that I would be unveiling the concept of '20% Time' in my classroom (click here to read it). Three months on, has it had any impact...?The first issue arises with that question - how do you define and measure impact? I hope that the rest of this post clears that one up.
After announcing the inclusion of 20% Time into the timetable, children were buzzing with ideas and interests. Parents were discussing it on the playground, children were gathering resources or researching relevant material, and my Head Teacher was a star in trusting me to try it out.
Each child spent a three minute 'meeting' with me to discuss and document their ideas and, most importantly, what they would be learning and achieving with their project. They had to be critical too - what did they need to improve upon? What did they genuinely want to learn? Each child left the meeting with a clear idea on their learning and a rough idea of what the success criteria would look like. The best part? Each and every child had an intrinsic desire to learn. Promise.
As the 20& Time sessions began flowing over the next couple of weeks, the atmosphere was remarkable. I spent a good twenty minutes (and I'll happily admit this!) just sitting and observing the children. Did they even need me anymore?!
In reality, 20% Time sessions were the busiest sessions that I'd be involved with, and they continue to be so. Effectively monitoring 24 different projects to ensure definite, powerful learning isn't a laid back task. But it's lovely. Advice and feedback is fairly easy though - each child has 23 contacts for that.

Projects began to take shape as weeks went by and children rarely lost focus. If they did, they soon got it back by looking at what they set out to learn and improve upon. A proportion of the learning that took place was also serendipitous (a type of learning that I'm beginning to fall in love with) - learning things that they hadn't necessarily set out to learn along the way.
We had recipe books, websites, help guides, movie reviews, game reviews, storybooks, manuals, artwork and more, with a plethora of topics. Topics that genuinely interested the child.
The pessimistic amongst you (that's unfair - I guess 'realistic' is the word I should be using) will want to know about 'that one child'. You know - the sort of child who seizes an opportunity like this to waste time on a computer and produce not a lot. All it took to remove this was careful monitoring and more structured feedback from me. And in terms of children with SEN? They just got on, seeking support as and when it was required from whoever they felt was right for the job. In fact, they really shined.
The gritty bit for data lovers: Progress made by children has been above what I would have expected. 20% Time is not solely the credit-taker for that, but it has definitely had an impact - you only have to look at the attitudes of the class. Children work hard on their other work to ensure 20% Time and their standards are higher - if their own projects are so good, they must be capable of doing that with other work too, right?
One girl really summed it up for me. This quote isn't modified at all. Promise number two.
"Yeah I'm actually pretty proud of this. It's the sort of thing I joked to my mum about doing when I'm older. I've learnt how to make instructions interesting to read and I know how difficult it is to make something that stands out to a reader. It'd probably have been easier with someone helping me though."
20% Time has developed a class of intrinsically motivated learners who strive to make themselves proud without any fear whatsoever of making mistakes. They are flexible, find solutions to problems and they offer realistic advice to their peers - appreciating the importance of interdependence within society. Their projects are memorable and they are unique - bursting with creativity. 20% Time will be a part of my timetable until the day I leave the teaching profession.

INTERESTED? If you're interested in the concept of 20% Time and would like to know more, drop me an email at stuart@sjeducation.co.uk or leave a comment below.
I do love this and would love to see the hard evidence of the learning, as well as the qualitative (which is impressive so far) it strikes me, as I read this that you have set up "ACTION RESEARCH" in the classroom. Or even (dare I suggest a label better than 2o% time?) Action Learning, or even Interdependent Time... yes, love it and would like to come and visit and do some of the support and feedback.... (hint hint)
ReplyDeleteGreat concept and, hey, if it works for Google! Getting young people to engage with learning can be difficult in a syllabus/exam driven world, ie, they're learning because they have to, not because they want to. Too often kids experience this...Q'Why are we learning this sir?' Answer 'Because it might be on the exam.' And the passion for learning dies
ReplyDeleteLove the way you've structured it. The 'rules' are very important
Would also love future blogs and anecdotal stuff about the results. I'm not fussed about hard evidence. Common sense tells me it's a brilliant strategy. Common sense also tells me that not all teachers can get away with using it. Respect for the teacher is an essential pre-requisite so, ironically, those teachers who have already engaged their students will be able to use '20% time'. Those who haven't....oh dear
I'm really impressed with your writing skills and also with the layout on your weblog. Is this a paid theme or did you customize it yourself? Either way keep up the excellent quality writing, it's
ReplyDeleterare to see a great blog like this one nowadays.
Also visit my weblog :: Munichtours
Stuart I was really interested in the idea of 20% time for children to work on a topic of genuine interest to them. It sounds like it was a great success. I am a PgCE student at the moment and would be grateful if you could email further details.
ReplyDeleteMy email is ka.smedley@ntlworld.com
Thanks
How do you manage "gathering of resources and materials". Do you take care of that or do the students bring items in for their project. Also how do you have them explore topics for their projects prior to beginning the sessions. Love this idea
ReplyDeleteShawn,
DeleteStudents can bring in any resources that they require. They do, however, have access to most classroom/school resources so long as they can be well justified. This eliminates the novelty of using materials/resources for the sake of it.
As for the topics, they come from the children's personalities. It's about what they really (genuinely) care about or take interest in. If a child has to think about a topic and explore it, chances are they're doing it to please the teacher and it's not a real interest.
Do drop an email if you want more information.